described for such applications
too.
Thanks,
Vidya
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:41 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api
(IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
[ I'm forwarding Samita's answer to ietf@ietf.org on
her behalf. ]
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Last Call:
draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API
for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
Date: Tuesday 05 June 2007 20:44
From: Samita Chakrabarti
Hi Suresh, please see below:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 23:37, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Vidya,
(Cc:ing Julien as well)
Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
All,
I'm passing along a comment from one of our
developers. Sorry, I have not closely read the
draft myself. But, if more clarification is
Hi Vidya,
(Cc:ing Julien as well)
Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
All,
I'm passing along a comment from one of our developers. Sorry, I have
not closely read the draft myself. But, if more clarification is needed,
I'll be happy to get more information.
In section 13, the draft describes a
address. There should be a procedure described for such applications
too.
Thanks,
Vidya
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:41 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api
(IPv6 Socket API
Section 8 states
Applications MUST not set contradictory flags at the same time.
I think the document should specify what the API must do if
contradictory flags are set. That would be the normative MUST, not
the above statement of the obvious.
Brian
Brian,
Section 8 states
Applications MUST not set contradictory flags at the same time.
I think the document should specify what the API must do if
contradictory flags are set. That would be the normative MUST, not
the above statement of the obvious.
Thanks for your review, Brian!
I
On 2007-05-21 12:47, Jari Arkko wrote:
Brian,
Section 8 states
Applications MUST not set contradictory flags at the same time.
I think the document should specify what the API must do if
contradictory flags are set. That would be the normative MUST, not
the above statement of the
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection '
draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api-05.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments
