I am submitting one comment on draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd :
(1) Channel bindings are becoming increasingly necessary for new and
evolving uses of EAP.
This EAP-PWD protocol should provide for them.
Dorothy Stanley
Dorothy Stanley
Aruba Networks
Dorothy Stanley [mailto:dstan...@arubanetworks.com] writes:
I am submitting one comment on draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd :
(1) Channel bindings are becoming increasingly necessary for new and
evolving uses of EAP.
This point is certainly debatable, if for no other reason that the concept
of
Glen, I have to agree with Dorothy's comment. This method should
provide for channel binding support. I find your unsubstantiated
assertion that doing so wouldbe be absurd uncompelling.
You claim that channel bindings are poorly defined. I believe that
draft-ietf-emu-chbind brings us most if
I spent a fair amount of time talking to people about this draft
during the Stockholm IETF meeting. The whole debate about standards
track vs. informational began due to an error on my part. The
authors requested publication on the standards track, but I processed
the document for
My opinion is also that the best place to develop standards track EAP
methods is in a WG. We've published a fair number of other methods
through other means, and they have generally been either Informational
or Experimental. Of course, there is no hard and fast rule. But in this
situation I
It's come to my attention that there is an error in the above referenced
announcement
(http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6rid=49gid=0k1=934k2=6759tid=12481845
60). The announcement says The IESG has received a request from an
individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'EAP
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'EAP Authentication Using Only A Password '
draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-04.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this
