Dear Jonathan:
Thanks for our phone call yesterday afternoon (Thu March 10th) and your
summary below.
Please see my further comments below on your feedback on my review
comments (T-h), (T-i), (T-k), and (T-l),
a) where you labelled (T-h) and (T-i) as overtaken by events;
b) where (T-k) refers to
On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Rene Struik wrote:
Dear Jonathan:
Thanks for our phone call yesterday afternoon (Thu March 10th) and your
summary below.
Please see my further comments below on your feedback on my review
comments (T-h), (T-i), (T-k), and (T-l),
a) where you labelled (T-h)
Just to keep everyone informed: Dr. Struik and I spoke by phone earlier today
about his comments. My recollection of the conversation is that he accepted
most of the comments as resolved, modulo the following additional details:
(And Dr. Struik! One of our agreements has been overtaken by
On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rene Struik rstruik@gmail.com
Date: March 2, 2011 10:03:33 PM EST
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-herzog-static-ecdh-04.txt (Use of
static-static Elliptic-Curve Diffie-Hellman key
Dear colleagues:
Please find below my (modest) comments on draft-herzog-static-ecdh-05 (an
update of the document that occurred since the moment
of issuing the LC).
Best regards, Rene
==
I. Editorial comments:
(E-a) p. 1, Disclaimer, l. 3: conclusions and should read conclusions, and.
(E-b)
