- I'm lost about why we would continue to publish Informational process
RFCs (ignoring any existing pipeline of process documents remaining to
be published as RFCs).
To me the argument for making this one an RFC is mainly that it
fits together with the two other drafts mentioned previously,
Hi, Sam,
I agree with your note.
FWIW, and speaking only for the confused on the list,
- I understand why something should be a BCP (community consensus for a
process that doesn't change every year or so),
- I understand why something should be an ION (IESG consensus with
appropriate input
