On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 05:23:16PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Recently I've tried to use draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts in the
design of a GSS-API mechanism.
I think this is a good start but is not quite done yet.
I agree. I'm not sure whether it's best to proceed to publication then
Recently I've tried to use draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts in the
design of a GSS-API mechanism.
I think this is a good start but is not quite done yet.
draft-hartman-gss-eap-naming-00 discusses a couple of problems with
naming extensions:
* The format of attribute names proposed in this
The IESG iesg-secret...@ietf.org writes:
The IESG has received a request from the Kitten (GSS-API Next Generation)
WG (kitten) to consider the following document:
- 'GSS-API Naming Extensions '
draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts-08.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a
The IESG has received a request from the Kitten (GSS-API Next Generation)
WG (kitten) to consider the following document:
- 'GSS-API Naming Extensions '
draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts-08.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
