Sounds good.
But let me also suggest that this group does also participate in the RRG
activities:
I know how badly the orthogonality between intra- and inter-domain routing
hampers rerouting.
Unfortunately this is a severe obstacle we have to live with, given the
current link-state versus
Beginning
Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: Is the accomplishment of this document considered to be the
end or rather the beginning of activities on the rerouting topic ?
Heiner
In einer eMail vom 29.04.2008 22:35:53 Westeuropäische Normalzeit
schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Question: Is the accomplishment of this document considered to be the end or
rather the beginning of activities on the rerouting topic ?
Heiner
In einer eMail vom 29.04.2008 22:35:53 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The IESG has received a request from the Routing
The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG
(rtgwg) to consider the following document:
- 'Basic Specification for IP Fast-Reroute: Loop-free Alternates '
draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base-12.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next
