My individual opinion is that these changes are a matter of style, and
that the current text is fine. If there is strong support for these
changes I can enter an rfc editor note.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinf
by error I send the following only to Russ
1:
When more than one signature is present, the successful validation
| of one signature associated with a given signer is usually treated
| as a successful signature by that signer.
in this text is sued twice but with different meanings, maybe this
Please see the text in the updated document. This was changed in the
most recent version:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign-03.txt
Russ
At 09:50 AM 2/15/2007, Peter Sylvester wrote:
1 - The document goes beyond specifying how to determine if a message
To the second point:
Denis:
you describe that the text concerning how to determine one signer with
multiple
signature is weak, nobody has disagreed, the text says 'ought to be'
'usually' etc.
but then you start a new discussion about a single signature
verification which
is IMO not related
1 - The document goes beyond specifying how to determine if a message
is validly signed by a given signer. The core of the dispute is the following
proposed sentence:
| When the collection represents more than one signature, the successful
| validation of one of signature fr
Sam,
>> "Russ" == Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Russ> Denis: I do not consider these to be new comments. You made
>Russ> them during WG Last Call, and there was considerable
>Russ> discussion on the S/MIME WG mail list. In the end, you were
>Russ> unable to gain
> "Denis" == Denis Pinkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Denis> Sam,
>>> "Russ" == Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> Denis: I do not consider these to be new comments. You made
Russ> them during WG Last Call, and there was considerable
Russ> discussion on th
