Dear all,
I have substantive comments that were initially raised during the S-MIME WG
last call
(December 1, 2006) and that have not been incorporated into the draft.
The major issue is that the draft is proposing to state:
(...) the successful validation of one signature associated with e
Denis, it sounds like you have two issues:
1) This document goes beyond specifying how to determine if a message
is validly signed by a given signer.
2) There is not enough precision in the description of how to validate
a signature.
I strongly suggest that you try and build consensus for
