Alfred,
Thx for your review. The changes indicated inline below are being made in
-03, which will be published shortly.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Alfred HÎnes wrote:
> It looks like draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-02 is not yet ready for
> publication.
>
>
> Here is a collection of some edi
a...@tr-sys.de wrote:
> Hello,
> draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-02 intends to make
> mandatory-to-implement for TCP-AO two MAC algorithms,
> HMAC-SHA-1-96 and AES-128-CMAC-96, as well as two related KDFs.
>
> IIRC, other WG(s) have been advised last year by important stakeholders
> (in particular
It looks like draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-02 is not yet ready for
publication.
Here is a collection of some editorials (found on a quick pass
over the draft) that should be fixed:
(1) Section 1, last para
The text there does not reflect the order of presentation in the
remainder of the docum
Hello,
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-02 intends to make
mandatory-to-implement for TCP-AO two MAC algorithms,
HMAC-SHA-1-96 and AES-128-CMAC-96, as well as two related KDFs.
IIRC, other WG(s) have been advised last year by important stakeholders
(in particular NIST) to not standardize new use case
