> Since tags of 1 character are never well-formed, I suggest that the
> definition:
>
> SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..60))
>
> be amended to exclude the 1-character case. I assume that a zero-length
> tag, while also not defined in RFC 4646, was included in the I-D to
> allow the special
Hi -
>From: "McDonald, Ira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Feb 11, 2007 4:15 AM
>To: 'John Cowan' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], LTRU Working Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ietf@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language T
Doug Ewell scripsit:
> Since tags of 1 character are never well-formed, I suggest that the
> definition:
>
> SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..60))
>
> be amended to exclude the 1-character case. I assume that a zero-length
> tag, while also not defined in RFC 4646, was included in the I-D
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to
consider the following document:
- 'Language Tag MIB '
as a Proposed Standard
This document defines a profile of RFC 4646 language tags for use in a
particular application, by restricting the tags to lowerca
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Language Tag MIB '
as a Proposed Standard
The title seems to suggest that the document defines managed
objects for managing language tags, which is not the
