On 2/23/07, Adrian Farrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reference to RFC3986 includes "..., Was Internet-Draft " It is
unusual to include reference to the I-D that has subsequently become an RFC.
Probably best just to leave this text out.
Ditto RFC3305, RFC3414, and RFC3415.
Sorry, this on
>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:02 PM
Subject: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-uri-mib (Uniform Resource Identifier
(URI) MIB) to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Uniform Re
n IRI
encoded in UTF-8, for example.
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:02 PM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-uri-mib (
Sam Hartman wrote:
The title of this document is very confusing and should be revised to
include the string textual convention.
Seeing this last call announcement I was very puzzled why anyone
thought it would be a good idea to hae a MIB for monitoring and
managing all the URIs on a managed syst
The title of this document is very confusing and should be revised to
include the string textual convention.
Seeing this last call announcement I was very puzzled why anyone
thought it would be a good idea to hae a MIB for monitoring and
managing all the URIs on a managed system. I was gratifie
