On 10/27/2011 09:02 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
The fact that the SHA-384 is used in the latter case in combination
with AES_256 it implies that SHA256 was replaced by SHA384 to
increase the security (the same way AES-128 was replaced by
AES-256). However there is no evidence that a 96-bit SHA384
On 10/16/2011 09:23 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
A comment on this draft is that it might be misleading on the
security levels it claims. It mentions: The Fact Sheet on Suite
B Cryptography requires key establishment and authentication
algorithms based on Elliptic Curve Cryptography
Nikos:
A comment on this draft is that it might be misleading on the
security levels it claims. It mentions: The Fact Sheet on Suite
B Cryptography requires key establishment and authentication
algorithms based on Elliptic Curve Cryptography and encryption
using AES [AES]. Suite B
On 10/27/2011 07:37 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
more than 96-bits of security.
It is important to distinguish between off-line and on-line
attacks. It is common (though perhaps not universal) to rate
the strength of cryptography in terms of resistance to off-line
attack, and that is what Suite
Nikos:
more than 96-bits of security.
It is important to distinguish between off-line and on-line
attacks. It is common (though perhaps not universal) to rate
the strength of cryptography in terms of resistance to off-line
attack, and that is what Suite B minimum levels of security
On 10/14/2011 12:13 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
A comment on this draft is that it might be misleading on the
security levels it claims. It mentions: The Fact Sheet on Suite B
Cryptography requires key establishment and authentication
algorithms based on Elliptic Curve Cryptography and encryption
Nikos:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Suite B Profile for Transport Layer Security (TLS)'
draft-salter-rfc5430bis-01.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
On 10/03/2011 10:55 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Suite B Profile for Transport Layer Security (TLS)'
draft-salter-rfc5430bis-01.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Suite B Profile for Transport Layer Security (TLS)'
draft-salter-rfc5430bis-01.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on
