Hi Fred,
At 00:50 27-02-2014, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
I'm having some problems deciphering this conversation, and the
traffic-peeking draft. What is being alleged, and by whom?
Nothing is being alleged. I mentioned (in the draft) that It was
the belief of the IETF that mechanisms designed
On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:55 AM, S Moonesamy sm+i...@elandsys.com wrote:
The end user will usually be at the losing end of the bargain in
a tussle between the end user and government when Internet traffic
wiretapping is a matter of national security.
That depends on context. In a technology
that I do
not work for Cisco. I am okay with any questions about that. I
prefer to answer them on i...@ietf.org.
Appendix C of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-traffic-peeking-01
discusses about lawful interception. There is a sentence about the
IETF perspective about
Howdy,
I don't know if it constitutes something happening in
the area, but we're trying to firm up plans for Fred Baker
to say some words about it at the IAB plenary on Wednesday
evening.
Leslie.
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
With regard to draft-baker-slem-architecture-01.txt and the surrounding
With regard to draft-baker-slem-architecture-01.txt and the surrounding
issues: is anything happening in this area in Vienna?
