Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harald Tveit Alvestrand) wrote on 15.07.04 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Short answer: No. Long answer: This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags. List-Id: IETF-Discussion ietf.ietf.org

[IETF] Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )

At 17:24 15/07/04, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags. It would be illusory to have everyone (consensus) accepting to be nice/polite to a few/many others and to conform to a

Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )

Hi. Since I'm the apparent offender... Those little inserts are a function of list management software (which software is chosen and how it is configured), and not the actions of individual authors (despite the indication I manually included in this posting). If a change in how the IETF list

Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )

Short answer: No. Long answer: This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags. Harald --On 15. juli 2004 10:35 -0400 John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. Since I'm the apparent offender...

Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )

Not to feed the troll, but, if I remember correctly, the overwhelming response is always: we don't need it. Procmail can filter fine without it. So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember), why not just turn it on, to avoid the quarterly request? Not everyone uses

Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )

David Frascone wrote: [..] So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember), why not just turn it on, Finally we're a true Standards Organization. cheers, gja ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]