Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition)

2003-06-19 Thread james woodyatt
On Wednesday, Jun 18, 2003, at 12:51 US/Pacific, Keith Moore wrote: [I wrote:] When customers of retail Internet service start demanding a NAT standard, then that's when the IETF might want to think about documenting the standard that the market seems to want. here's the only thing that a NAT

NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition)

2003-06-18 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
--On tirsdag, juni 17, 2003 19:33:24 -0700 Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: The key in my view is to work on the NAT vendors, instead of viewing NAT boxes as an obstacle they should be seen for what they

Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition)

2003-06-18 Thread Keith Moore
When customers of retail Internet service start demanding a NAT standard, then that's when the IETF might want to think about documenting the standard that the market seems to want. here's the only thing that a NAT standard should say: an intermediary MUST NOT alter the source or