So - Scott, can you confirm that you think quorum rules should be in the
BCP? Rob, can you confirm that you think they should not be?
imo - if rules for voting are in the document then quorum rules should be
but I'm fine with the idea that the document say
1/ general method is
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Brian, John, Avri and Spencer: Can you state if you have an opinion
about whether or not the quorum rules should be in the document or not?
Let's get this point settled before we dig into what the quorum rules
should be - if they don't go into the BCP, the whole text of
At Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:22:58 +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
...
So - Scott, can you confirm that you think quorum rules should be in the
BCP? Rob, can you confirm that you think they should not be?
hat editor=off just-another-bozo=on
Sorry, I had missed that there was a direct
In the -03 version of the document, the following text occurs:
3.4 IAOC Decision Making
The IAOC attempts to reach all decisions unanimously. If unanimity
cannot be achieved, the IAOC chair may conduct informal polls to
determine the consensus of the group. In cases where it is
Harald,
My personal, generic, preference is to put as little specific
text into the BCP as possible. Broad principles, yes. But
anything very specific, especially anything that is likely to
need tuning, should be in the BCP only if there are really
strong reasons why that is necessary. So I'd
Brian, John, Avri and Spencer: Can you state if you have an opinion
about whether or not the quorum rules should be in the document or
not?
Let's get this point settled before we dig into what the quorum
rules should be - if they don't go into the BCP, the whole text of
#746 gets passed as
