Just to say me too...
I think that Andrew as Nomcom chair needs to have the authority to make
the decision in this case and make it stick, no matter how many people
think that he could have done better.
I've got no problem with the community having opinions about his
decisions, and even
Marshall,
Members of the IETF community must have registered for and attended at
least 3 of...
(Yes, people do sneak in - why should they be allowed to be on the
Nomcom ?)
This is not an issue in practice. The list that is used for the
check is the list of those registered on site;
will, of
course, have my compete support.
-Original Message-
From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:04 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset
Just to say me too...
I think that Andrew as Nomcom chair
Andrew Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few members of the community have expressed concern over two issues with
the selection process for this year's NomCom.
I'm taking the liberty of responding to the second first.
Second: A sitting member of the IAB's name appeared on the candidate
On Aug 31, 2006, at 3:27 PM, John Leslie wrote:
Andrew Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few members of the community have expressed concern over two
issues with
the selection process for this year's NomCom.
I'm taking the liberty of responding to the second first.
Second: A
A few members of the community have expressed concern over two issues with
the selection process for this year's NomCom.
First: The list of volunteers was published later than recommended by RFC
3777. This happened because, after the nominations period closed, there
was some dispute on the
