On 9/22/2010 1:02 PM, Thomas Walsh wrote:
Is Disclosure Mandated by RFC 5680: -- No, it
is not. RFC 5680 does not require any NomCom to disclose the list at all nor
to disclose the entire list for that matter. Since this is the first time
the open disclosure ha
:14 PM
To: Thomas Walsh; Ross Callon; dcroc...@bbiw.net; IETF discussion list; NomCom
Chair
Subject: RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open
Disclosure
Tom,
Thanks, this is very helpful. As I read RFC 5680, it does not change in any
way the handling of confidential
; From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:02 PM
> To: Ross Callon; dcroc...@bbiw.net; IETF discussion list; NomCom Chair
> Subject: RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open
>
PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open
Disclosure
On 9/22/2010 12:28 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 08:53 -0700 Dave CROCKER
> wrote:
>> ...On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting an
>
At 11:41 22-09-10, John C Klensin wrote:
raising issues of privacy, etc. I'm not too concerned about it,
but I wish that there had been more discussion of whether this
was necessary and other ways to accomplish it if it is.
Yes.
RFC 5680 was published in October, 2009. It would be strange if
I agree with Dave that the issue is minor. But FWIW, I too had assumed
that the change that we approved did mean that the list would be public,
e.g., an open web page under the nomcom's pages.
Jari
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf
On 9/22/2010 12:28 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 08:53 -0700 Dave CROCKER
> wrote:
>> ...On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting an
>> IETF login is easy
>> enough to make this issue pretty minor, IMO.
>
> I have two thoughts on this:
>
> One the o
Walsh
Chair, NomCom 2010-2011
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ross
Callon
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:28 PM
To: dcroc...@bbiw.net
Cc: IETF discussion list; NomCom Chair
Subject: RE: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important I
--On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 08:53 -0700 Dave CROCKER
wrote:
> ...On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting an
> IETF login is easy
> enough to make this issue pretty minor, IMO.
I have two thoughts on this:
One the one hand, I agree with the part of Dave Crocker's email th
--On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 08:53 -0700 Dave CROCKER
wrote:
> On 9/21/2010 5:02 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>> The list of accepted candidates should be posted on the IETF
>> site like the rest of the noncom information.
>
>
> +1
>
> On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting
On 9/22/2010 8:53 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>
> On 9/21/2010 5:02 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>> The list of accepted candidates should be posted on the IETF site like
>> the
>> rest of the noncom information.
>
>
> +1
>
> On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting an IETF login
> is e
On 9/21/2010 5:02 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
The list of accepted candidates should be posted on the IETF site like the
rest of the noncom information.
+1
On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting an IETF login is easy
enough to make this issue pretty minor, IMO.
d/
--
Dave Cr
Thomas,
> I am a bit mystified. Since the IETF is open to anyone who cares
> to participate, there is no finite community within which to keep
> this list (or any other non-confidential information). Once the list
> of willing candidates is released, it is just as public as anything
> else in the
--On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:19 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
> Tom,
>
> On 2010-09-22 04:29, NomCom Chair wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> A few folks have submitted some very helpful comments and I'd
>> like to share the answers publicly.
>>
>> Q: If the List is Open why does it require
On 21/09/10 23:19, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> The IETF Community members are not authorized by this NomCom to disclose
>> it further. Keep the list within the community.
>
> I am a bit mystified.
Me too. I hope we don't end up with having to say a supposed
"ok" to 96 pages of gibberish leg
On Tue Sep 21 23:19:56 2010, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I am a bit mystified. Since the IETF is open to anyone who cares
to participate, there is no finite community within which to keep
this list (or any other non-confidential information)
Well, I'm not sure it matters. Anyone interested in the
Tom,
On 2010-09-22 04:29, NomCom Chair wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> A few folks have submitted some very helpful comments and I'd like to
> share the answers publicly.
>
> Q: If the List is Open why does it require a Login?
>
> A: As interpreted by this NomCom, the list is disclosed to the IETF
> com
-Original Message-
From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of NomCom Chair
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:29 PM
To: IETF Announcement list
Subject: Nomcom 2010-2011: READ THIS: Important Information on Open Disclosure
Hi Folks,
A
18 matches
Mail list logo
