Dave Crocker wrote:
>Michael StJohns wrote:
>
>
>>At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>>
>>
>>>*The names of people nominated should be made public.
>>>*The names of the people who agreed to serve if selected should be kept
>>>secret.
>>>
>>>
>>+1
>>
>>Open enough to
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>> *The names of people nominated should be made public.
>> *The names of the people who agreed to serve if selected should be
>> kept secret.
...
>> Brian, many thinks are easy to say without thinkin
On 2008-03-19 16:40, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> On 2008-03-19 15:23, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>> Michael StJohns wrote:
At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> *The names of people nominated should be made public.
> *The names of the people who
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2008-03-19 15:23, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> Michael StJohns wrote:
>>> At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
*The names of people nominated should be made public.
*The names of the people who agreed to serve if selected should be kept
sec
On 2008-03-19 15:23, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> Michael StJohns wrote:
>> At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>>> *The names of people nominated should be made public.
>>> *The names of the people who agreed to serve if selected should be kept
>>> secret.
>> +1
>>
>> Open enough to
Michael StJohns wrote:
> At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>> *The names of people nominated should be made public.
>> *The names of the people who agreed to serve if selected should be kept
>> secret.
>
> +1
>
> Open enough to get feedback, but kind to the rejected candida
At 10:46 PM 3/17/2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>*The names of people nominated should be made public.
>*The names of the people who agreed to serve if selected should be kept
>secret.
+1
Open enough to get feedback, but kind to the rejected candidates.
__
Brian E Carpenter skrev:
> Hi Lakshimnath, just a few notes and queries...
>
> On 2008-03-16 16:10, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> ...
>
>> * Nominee lists should be made public. In fact, other selection
>> processes within the IETF make the candidate lists public and so it is
>> time we let go
I have been a bit under the weather and responding to some of the
emails. I hope to catch up in the next couple of days.
On 3/16/2008 1:56 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Lakshimnath, just a few notes and queries...
>
> On 2008-03-16 16:10, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> ...
>> * Nominee lists
Inline:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Lakshimnath, just a few notes and queries...
>
> On 2008-03-16 16:10, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> ...
> > * Nominee lists should be made public. In fact, other selection
> > processes within the IETF make the candidate lists public a
On 3/16/08 3:56 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I recall, this was discussed extensively before 3777 (and before
> 2727) and opinions were so evenly split that the only possible
> conclusion was "no consensus for change". So we'll need to see if
> opinions have changed...
R
Hi Lakshimnath, just a few notes and queries...
On 2008-03-16 16:10, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
...
> * Nominee lists should be made public. In fact, other selection
> processes within the IETF make the candidate lists public and so it is
> time we let go of this in the nomcom context. The cas
On Mar 15, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> I understand that there is work underway on the topic of revising 3777
> and I have also had several discussions with various folks on this
> topic. With no intention to undermine the work already underway, I
> will
> briefly state some
I understand that there is work underway on the topic of revising 3777
and I have also had several discussions with various folks on this
topic. With no intention to undermine the work already underway, I will
briefly state some of my thoughts.
* Nominee lists should be made public. In fact,
14 matches
Mail list logo
