On 25 mrt 2008, at 22:39, David Harrington wrote:
I think asking attendees during registration which sessions they
intend to attend and building a conflict matrix would be the simplest
approach. Of course, attendee conflicts matter less than ADs, chairs,
and presenter conflicts.
Actually we
On Mar 25, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Steve Silverman wrote:
The Blue Sheets only tell you where someone was rather than where they
wanted to be.
I'd also note that people may wind up on multiple Blue Sheets. I
know that I have started in one WG and signed the Blue Sheet there
and then wound up
On 25 mrt 2008, at 4:58, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
The WG scheduling tool has 3 lists of groups to avoid conflicts
with, 1st, 2nd and 3rd priority.
I don't know if these are visible to anyone but the requesting WG
Chair, but they're listed on the confirmation notice from the tool;
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:22:05PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
So I'm offering to build an online version of the blue sheets so in
the future, it will be easy to determine which wgs attract the same
people and overlap can be avoided more effectively.
as someone who has
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:22:05PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
So I'm offering to build an online version of the blue sheets so in
the future, it will be easy to determine which wgs attract the same
people and overlap can be avoided more
On 25 Mar 2008, at 10:08 , Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:22:05PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
So I'm offering to build an online version of the blue sheets so in
the future, it will be easy to determine which wgs
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:22:05PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
So I'm offering to build an online version of the blue sheets so in
the future, it will be easy to
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:17:36AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
On 25 Mar 2008, at 10:08 , Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:22:05PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
So I'm offering to build an online version of the blue sheets
On Mar 25, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:22:05PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum
wrote:
So I'm offering to build an online version of the blue
Discussion
Subject: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
On 25 mrt 2008, at 4:58, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
The WG scheduling tool has 3 lists of groups to avoid conflicts
with, 1st, 2nd and 3rd priority.
I don't know if these are visible to anyone but the requesting WG
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Iljitsch van Beijnum
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:22 AM
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
On 25 mrt 2008
Tveit Alvestrand
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
On 25 mrt 2008, at 4:58, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
The WG scheduling tool has 3 lists of groups to avoid conflicts
with, 1st, 2nd and 3rd priority.
I don't know if these are visible
12 matches
Mail list logo
