Each IETF document mentions the authors place address (I may suggest
adding region, as a categorised by IETF), but not sure of history
statistics of how many IETF-documents produced by authors in South
America, Africa, or Asia, or others.
I think it is a good marketing start for IETF to get more
On May 27, 2013, at 12:10, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> Each IETF document mentions the authors place address (I may suggest
> adding region, as a categorised by IETF), but not sure of history
> statistics of how many IETF-documents produced by authors in South
> America, Africa, or Asia, or others.
On 5/27/13, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> On May 27, 2013, at 12:10, Abdussalam Baryun
> wrote:
>> Each IETF document mentions the authors place address (I may suggest
>> adding region, as a categorised by IETF), but not sure of history
>> statistics of how many IETF-documents produced by authors in Sout
On May 27, 2013, at 15:31, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> On 5/27/13, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> On May 27, 2013, at 12:10, Abdussalam Baryun
>> wrote:
>>> Each IETF document mentions the authors place address (I may suggest
>>> adding region, as a categorised by IETF), but not sure of history
>>> stati
But also remember, writing I+D is just part of the equation. We also
need reviewers and comments.
Regards,
as
On 5/27/13 7:51 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> On May 27, 2013, at 12:10, Abdussalam Baryun
> wrote:
>> Each IETF document mentions the authors place address (I may suggest
>> addin
Rather than saying "someone should do this" on the list, you could, you know,
do the work.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On 2013-05-27, at 9:31, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> On 5/27/13, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> On May 27, 2013, at 12:10, Abdussalam Baryun
>> wrote:
>>
by looking into the statistics of I-Ds and RFCs, it is strange that we get
sometimes high rate in the I-D going in IETF from some regions but the
success rate of I-Ds to become RFCs is very low (5- 50). So the only region
that is producing RFCs with high rate (about 200 per year) is North America
e
Hi,
On May 28, 2013, at 19:46, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> by looking into the statistics of I-Ds and RFCs, it is strange that we get
> sometimes high rate in the I-D going in IETF from some regions but the
> success rate of I-Ds to become RFCs is very low (5- 50).
which IDs and RFCs are you basi
>> by looking into the statistics of I-Ds and RFCs, it is strange that we get
>> sometimes high rate in the I-D going in IETF from some regions but the
>> success rate of I-Ds to become RFCs is very low (5- 50).
There seems to be a general pattern where new participants first participate
and/or
--On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 18:20 +0300 Jari Arkko
wrote:
> There seems to be a general pattern where new participants
> first participate and/or produce IDs but it takes some time to
> produce RFCs. For instance, for a while it was the case that
> there was a growing number of proposals and p
Hi Lars,
It was for Asia region, I thought its rate is between (5 - 50)
rfc/year for last 3 years. Basing on; The first figure of RFCs is the
Comparison of countries over the year [1], the second, is the
Distribution of number of RFCs per continent [2], the third is
publication rate per year [3].
I would take those numbers with a HUGE grain of salt (as Jari documents).
For example, I've lived in Australia since 2006, and yet am only listed as
producing RFCs in the USA.
Regards,
On 30/05/2013, at 10:39 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> It was for Asia region, I thought its
On 5/29/13, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>>> by looking into the statistics of I-Ds and RFCs, it is strange that we
>>> get
>>> sometimes high rate in the I-D going in IETF from some regions but the
>>> success rate of I-Ds to become RFCs is very low (5- 50).
>
> There seems to be a general pattern where n
han affiliation).
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Nottingham [m...@mnot.net]
Sent: 30 May 2013 01:45
To: Abdussalam Baryun
Cc: ietf
Subject: Re: Participation per Region of Authoring
Lloyd,
> http://www.arkko.com/tools/recrfcstats/d-contdistr.html
> (Jari, what time period is that across? Oceania doesn't rate a mention…)
"Recent RFCs" is anything from RFC 5400 onwards. An arbitrary definition.
And Oceania is listed under "Australia" per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contine
Mark:
> I would take those numbers with a HUGE grain of salt (as Jari documents).
Indeed
> For example, I've lived in Australia since 2006, and yet am only listed as
> producing RFCs in the USA.
My apologies. I added a data item to recognise you…
Jari
Thanks :)
On 30/05/2013, at 5:06 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
> Mark:
>
>> I would take those numbers with a HUGE grain of salt (as Jari documents).
>
> Indeed
>
>> For example, I've lived in Australia since 2006, and yet am only listed as
>> producing RFCs in the USA.
>
> My apologies. I added
On May 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I would take those numbers with a HUGE grain of salt (as Jari documents).
I appreciate Jari's effort and use his page extensively. However, I agree taht
geography data should be taken with a grain of salt.
In my case I created several docum
18 matches
Mail list logo
