At 19:19 22/03/04, John C Klensin wrote:
The subject is not going to do away as long as people think they have a
fundamental human right to do the equivalent of moving to a cardboard box
under a bridge and then demanding banks and creditcard companies to see
them as creditworthy as their bourgeo
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:19:12 -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
>And, as far as I can tell, you do intelligible English very well.
I am travelling just now but when I come to rest I volunteer to
look over if this would be of value.
Jeffrey Race
--On Friday, 19 March, 2004 18:34 -0700 Vernon Schryver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: John C Klensin
Last week's version of the spam discussions, led to an
interesting (to me) side-discussion about what was, and was
not, an "Internet connection" service. ...
draft-klensin-ip-service-term
> From: John C Klensin
> Last week's version of the spam discussions, led to an
> interesting (to me) side-discussion about what was, and was not,
> an "Internet connection" service. ...
> draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-00.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-ip-service-ter
Last week's version of the spam discussions, led to an
interesting (to me) side-discussion about what was, and was not,
an "Internet connection" service. There have been discussions
on and off for years (since before the User Services area was
inactivated) about doing such a set of definitions
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Dr. Jeffrey Race wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 17:03:14 -0500 (EST), Dean Anderson wrote:
>
> >No such thing was ever found. And just the opposite was proved to you in
> >Exactis V. MAPS. That lawsuit was settled out of court,
>
> Dean you have expressed your case well but
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 17:03:14 -0500 (EST), Dean Anderson wrote:
>No such thing was ever found. And just the opposite was proved to you in
>Exactis V. MAPS. That lawsuit was settled out of court,
Dean you have expressed your case well but in the end you must agree
none of this is persuasive beca
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:27:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
On 12 Mar 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
> ultimately it was found that no law or regulation required carriage, an
For some reason, this message, sent at 17:43 EST, has not made it to the
list, or showed up in the list archive, even though a message sent after
it is in the archive.
http://info.av8.net/spamstuff/vix-spam-abatement-ietf
Mar 12 17:43:34 cirrus sendmail[23157]: i2CMhXMU023157:
from=<[EMAIL PRO
