-> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; Hadmut Danisch
--> Subject: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high
--> volume spam
-->
--> A WG?
-->
--> Karin and me are interested.
-->
--> JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
--> > At 23:10 14/12/2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
--> &
Peter,
the first step in creating a WG (RFC 2418/BCP 25) is to discuss it
with an AD. The problem is that one can consider different approaches:
1. chaffing as a Security Area issue. But there are much more
environment as it is the remote global user protection (and not only
his machine).
2.
A WG?
Karin and me are interested.
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
At 23:10 14/12/2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:46:42PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>
> The best way to hide a signal is noise, is that's your idea ?
> Makes sense from my POV.
Not necessarily the _best_ w