RE: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam

2005-12-16 Thread Gray, Eric
-> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; Hadmut Danisch --> Subject: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high --> volume spam --> --> A WG? --> --> Karin and me are interested. --> --> JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: --> > At 23:10 14/12/2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote: --> &

Re: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam

2005-12-16 Thread JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Peter, the first step in creating a WG (RFC 2418/BCP 25) is to discuss it with an AD. The problem is that one can consider different approaches: 1. chaffing as a Security Area issue. But there are much more environment as it is the remote global user protection (and not only his machine). 2.

Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam

2005-12-16 Thread Peter Dambier
A WG? Karin and me are interested. JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: At 23:10 14/12/2005, Hadmut Danisch wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:46:42PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > The best way to hide a signal is noise, is that's your idea ? > Makes sense from my POV. Not necessarily the _best_ w