Hi Tidd and All,
The General Area WGs focus on IETF processes and policies, I don't
think projects are done there,
So then would this WG also be an incubator for projects?
The IETF-WG I propose is only to do with IETF processes and policies
(procedures, and best practices), not incubator
Hi All,
I think there is a need to have at least one WG in the General Area
(GA). The question is: why we have a GA without focused work or
community representation? I understand from the IETF procedures that
this organisation works through WGs, so it can make progresses through
WGs. The GA has
On 6/24/2012 2:09 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
Hi All,
I think there is a need to have at least one WG in the General Area
(GA). The question is: why we have a GA without focused work or
community representation? I understand from the IETF procedures that
this organisation works through WGs, so
