Re: Publishing call for discussion?

On 18.04.2010 19:37, Steven Bellovin wrote: ... You submit I-Ds via https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi; as long as you meet the publication requirements (formatting, boilerplate, etc.) and don't name is as a working group draft without the consent of the chairs, publication is more o

Re: Publishing call for discussion?

>]Thanks for the info. I'm reading the documents to figure out how IETF process >works... The Toa of the IETF: >So basically, you write an I-D, send it to RFC editor. It gets published, >people discuss it. Later on it expires and is removed. RFCs are never expire

Re: Publishing call for discussion?

Steven, Marshall, So basically, you write an I-D, send it to RFC editor. It gets published, people discuss it. Later on it expires and is removed. Not quite -- the RFC editor gets involved only when the decision has been made to publish it as an RFC. You submit I-Ds via https://datatracker.

Re: Publishing call for discussion?

On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote: On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:31 59PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: On 04/18/2010 06:58 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: Is there a standard way to publish a "call for discussion" memo? Yes, an internet-draft, perhaps containg prose suc

Re: Publishing call for discussion?

On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:31 59PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: > Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >> On 04/18/2010 06:58 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: >>> Is there a standard way to publish a "call for discussion" memo? >> Yes, an internet-draft, perhaps containg prose such as "this draft is >> intended to initiate di

Re: Publishing call for discussion?

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: On 04/18/2010 06:58 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: Is there a standard way to publish a "call for discussion" memo? Yes, an internet-draft, perhaps containg prose such as "this draft is intended to initiate discussion. At this time, the author does not intend it to reach R

Re: Publishing call for discussion?

On 04/18/2010 06:58 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: Is there a standard way to publish a "call for discussion" memo? Yes, an internet-draft, perhaps containg prose such as "this draft is intended to initiate discussion. At this time, the author does not intend it to reach RFC status." A little la

Publishing call for discussion?

Hi, Is there a standard way to publish a "call for discussion" memo? Searching though RFCs is seems there exists such type of document. For instance RFC 970 says: "The purpose of this RFC is to focus discussion on particular problems in the ARPA-Internet and possible methods of solution.