Yeah, but we don't actually count the clubs, so it's okay.
On 07/03/2013 05:20 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
C: does my appeal look more like the club of 3, or the club of 11?
I think there's a new club of one.
Wait, so now instead of voting we're using clubs? I think I need to pay
more attention to this thread ...
> C: does my appeal look more like the club of 3, or the club of 11?
I think there's a new club of one.
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> +1
>
> And don't lets forget that plenty of people have proposed schemes that WGs
> have turned down and then been proven right years later.
>
> If people are just saying what everyone else is saying here then they are not
> adding a
