On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:20:09PM -0500, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
Yes, I can.
The ISC's DHCP server (www.isc.org) does this (I'm not sure whether it
uses MD5 to encode the client identity or not). Ted might know for sure.
It does, though it only encodes the client identity (client
On Monday 28 November 2005 23:40, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
This means that we will not have a backwards compatibility issue with the
installed base if we change the format of the record, but *will* have a
procedural compatibility issue if we don't keep the property of you can
know the
The Nominum DHCP server (DCS) supports the exact mechanism described in the
collection of documents, except that the data is stored in a TXT record
rather than a DHCID record, because we are waiting on the DHCID record. We
also implement the older version of the protocol that the ISC server
; dhcwg@ietf.org; namedroppers@ops.ietf.org;
Pekka Savola; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:
'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed
Standard]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ted Lemon writes:
Making a hash function
;
Pekka Savola; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:
'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed
Standard]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ted Lemon writes:
Making a hash function interchangeable in DHCID makes the
conflict detection
--On mandag, november 28, 2005 17:00:39 -0500 Bernie Volz (volz)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I confess that I don't see the problem. The updater would do a DNS
query for DHCID RRs; it would be given all of the stored
records.
That's not how the current update algorithm works. Sure, we could
To: Bernie Volz (volz); Steven M. Bellovin; Ted Lemon
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; Pekka Savola; ietf@ietf.org;
namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last
Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to
Proposed Standard]
--On mandag
. Bellovin
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 11:57 AM
To: Pekka Savola
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org;
ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:
'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed
Standard]
In message
Thanks - these responses point out very clearly that the mechanism is being
used as described, *except* for the bit that's contentious (use of MD5 for
information hiding).
This means that we will not have a backwards compatibility issue with the
installed base if we change the format of the
--On tirsdag, november 29, 2005 00:03:03 -0700 Ted Lemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 28 November 2005 23:40, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
This means that we will not have a backwards compatibility issue with the
installed base if we change the format of the record, but *will* have
10 matches
Mail list logo
