I support what Vidya said about opening that one issue. However, I think
we should address Charlie's other comments.
Jari
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Thanks Charlie for the comments and sorry for the delay in addressing them.
Most of your comments are editorial and I can produce a new revision since I
received also comments from Gen-Art review.
You have one comment on the recommendation in the draft to have separate
binding cache entries.
Hello Gerardo,
Comments below...
On 5/17/2010 8:17 AM, Giaretta, Gerardo wrote:
You have one comment on the recommendation in the draft to have
separate binding cache entries. This was extensively discussed
in the NETLMM WG and also at the IETF Dublin meeting. There was
a mailing list
Charlie,
Thank you for your review and comments. Please note that the WG has spent a lot
of time on this topic of same vs. separate BCEs. We have had two consensus
calls on it after discussion at a meeting. As you have seen from the thread,
the chairs did see rough consensus to move on
