RE: A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-21 Thread Yaakov Stein
> In addition, BCP 10 (RFC 3777) in no way limits the > NomCom from selecting sitting ISOC Board members to be on the > IAB or IESG. I think it would be best to avoid having ADs on the BoT, as they are overworked already, and (should be) focused on producing the protocols we need now. However

Re: A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-21 Thread Thomas Narten
> There is a new relationship between ISOC and the IETF for administrative > support as defined by BCP 101 (RFC 4071). Given these changes in our > ties to ISOC, the IAB has been discussing (without coming to any > conclusion on the matter) whether it is any longer appropriate for > someone to simu

RE: A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-21 Thread sbrim
Leslie allegedly wrote: > Annually, the IAB makes an appointment to one of three seats on the > Internet Society Board of Trustees (ISOC BoT). BCP 77 (RFC 3677), > which describes the selection process, allows IESG and IAB members to > be selected for the ISOC Board, though no more than two of the