@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Change in I-D announcement format
Brian:
There was no announcement that this change was about to be deployed;
however, there was a long discussion of the change. It started with a
request for the HTML version of the I-D instead
put bluntly, we all know the mail tools we're using to process these mails, and
the mails could be a damn sight more tractable for tools than they are.
ever tried sorting drafts by subject line?
that old draft-random-group-something-KEYWORD-version is really suckful for
something as basic as
Hi Tom,
On 10/24/2012 09:28 AM, t.p. wrote:
And now there seems to be another unannounced change, in that in
addition to the usual announcement format e-mails, there may also be, or
may not be, the appearance seems random, of
Not so random. I noticed that the New Version Notification mails
This line is not too hot either:
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-01
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E
Carpenter
Sent: 13 June 2012 10:48
To: IETF discussion
Brian:
There was no announcement that this change was about to be deployed; however,
there was a long discussion of the change. It started with a request for the
HTML version of the I-D instead of the plain text version. At the end of the
discussion the decision was to use the Datatracker
Russ Housley wrote:
Brian:
There was no announcement that this change was about to be deployed;
however, there was a long discussion of the change. It started with
a request for the HTML version of the I-D instead of the plain
text version. At the end of the discussion the decision was to
