Re: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-25 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Ted Hardie wrote: > At 10:13 AM -0700 9/25/08, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > >> The proposed IETF IPR policy allows the public to modify the code present in >> IETF specifications but not to use that same specification to create >> modified text to document that modified code! Does anyone here honestly

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-25 Thread Ted Hardie
At 10:13 AM -0700 9/25/08, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > >The proposed IETF IPR policy allows the public to modify the code present in >IETF specifications but not to use that same specification to create >modified text to document that modified code! Does anyone here honestly >believe this is justifi

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-25 Thread Powers Chuck-RXCP20
ember 25, 2008 12:14 PM > To: 'Harald Alvestrand'; ietf@ietf.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: FW: IETF copying conditions > > Harald Alvestrand wrote; > > - The discussion of permitting change to text was extensive > and repeated. > > - The consensu

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-25 Thread Lawrence Rosen
dnesday, September 24, 2008 10:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: IETF copying conditions > > Lawrence Rosen wrote: > > Ted Hardie wrote: > > > >> Just to forestall Jorge spending some of his valuable time on this, > >&

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-22 Thread Black_David
Larry, > Paul Hoffman wrote: > > Which SDOs that you participate in want to see other SDOs publishing > > *incompatible* versions of their protocols? > > Hi Paul, > > Of course none of the SDOs that I work with want to see incompatible > versions. But this turns the issue on its head. Open sour

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Hoffman writes ("RE: FW: IETF copying conditions"): > Which SDOs that you participate in want to see other SDOs publishing > *incompatible* versions of their protocols? The Debian project has published a small (by IETF standards) but significant body of work specifying th

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-19 Thread Ted Hardie
At 11:00 AM -0700 9/18/08, Ian Jackson wrote: > >That a different system might do things differently would not be good >for Debian so we don't encourage it. We would prefer to keep Debian >and its derivatives as close as possible so that we can share >development work (particularly, so that we can

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-17 Thread Lawrence Rosen
not for "text" in our specifications. What a burden that imposes to protect people from freedom! /Larry > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org > Cc: [EM

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-17 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 2:43 PM -0700 9/17/08, Lawrence Rosen wrote: >I'm moving this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are important policy implications >here that the entire community should understand before we let the IPR WG >decide for us on a policy so opposite to open source and open standards! Larry, I'm confused. Wh

RE: FW: IETF copying conditions

2008-09-17 Thread Lawrence Rosen
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Brian E Carpenter > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: IETF copying conditions ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf