;> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of todd
>> glassey
>> Sent: 14 February 2012 17:43
>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Furthering discussions about BCP79 sanctions
>>
>> On 2/12/2012 10:12 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>&
Sent: 14 February 2012 17:43
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Furthering discussions about BCP79 sanctions
>
> On 2/12/2012 10:12 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi SM,
>
> So isnt the real issue that of informed consent? If you dont know that
> someone else has already exi
On 2/12/2012 10:12 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi SM,
So isnt the real issue that of informed consent? If you dont know that
someone else has already existing work is it their fault for not telling
the IETF?
If so then there would also need to be some form of process identical to
this for verifyin
Hi SM,
> >There has been some discussion on this list about
> >draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-00. Thanks for the input.
> >
> >The conversation seems to be partitioned into:
> >- discussion of sanctions and how to apply them
> >- discussion of measures that can be taken to
> > help people to
At 11:08 10-02-2012, Adrian Farrel wrote:
There has been some discussion on this list about
draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-00. Thanks for the input.
The conversation seems to be partitioned into:
- discussion of sanctions and how to apply them
- discussion of measures that can be taken to