I tried, but got
There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it
cannot be displayed.
Please try the following:
Click the Refresh button, or try again later.
Open the www.surveymonkey.com home page, and then look for links to
the information you want.
HTTP 500.100 - Int
Ray Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All;
>
> More than 1,250 of you attended IETF 65 in Dallas and many others
> attended sessions remotely. Yet only 155 of you have responded to a
> survey intended to make future meeting experiences more successful.
> There are only 74 days left before I
> More than 1,250 of you attended IETF 65 in Dallas and many others
> attended sessions remotely. Yet only 155 of you have responded to a
> survey intended to make future meeting experiences more successful.
Maybe we need to provide more incentive. ARIN enters those that
complete their survey i
y Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: "ietf@ietf.org"
> Asunto: Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
>
>> More than 1,250 of you attended IETF 65 in Dallas and many others
>> attended sessions remotely. Yet only 155 of you have responded to a
>> survey in
Earlier today, Ray suggested that only a small fraction of everyone who
went to Dallas has taken the 10 minutes needed to provide feedback on
the meeting.
I am posting this message to ask "Why so little response?"
Is it because only two hundred people read the IETF discussion list? If
so, then m
Well, obviously, those of us that did the survey should be rewarded
by having the consensus results acted upon ... if people don't like
the results in Montreal, they'll have more of an incentive to take
the survey at that time.
More seriously, Ray might get more of a result if he sent the requ
On 26-apr-2006, at 12:47, Ray Pelletier wrote:
More than 1,250 of you attended IETF 65 in Dallas and many others
attended sessions remotely. Yet only 155 of you have responded to
a survey
Isn't that more than enough to draw statistically significant
conclusions?
And when can we see the
All;
Some of you have experienced difficulty completing the survey.
The
problem has been fixed according to the vendor - a page rendering
issue. Please
retry and let me know if you cannot complete the survey.
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=649182049947
Thanks
Ray
Ray Pelletier wrote:
Al
Is it because only two hundred people read the IETF discussion list?
No, because it was also announced on the ietf-announce list which has
many more subscribers than this one. (Something to do with signal to noies
ratios.)
And btw we deliberately target everybody, and not just meeeting atten
