On 19 feb 2008, at 15:40, Dan York wrote:
Is this important? The external address(es) are still different.
Sure, but the home internal networks are identical. So Homeowner A
calls up the ISP support and is having a problem getting a machine
to work with the wireless router provided by
I'm not buying that this is so important that it's worth
having a box rewrite EVERY address in EVERY packet for.
If you really want this, you can simply create a loopback
interface with address fc00::1 on it and users can type
http://[fc00::1]/; (ok, so the brackets are annoying, but no
Hi, Iljitsch,
I'm confused...
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 feb 2008, at 15:40, Dan York wrote:
Is this important? The external address(es) are still different.
Sure, but the home internal networks are identical. So Homeowner A
calls up the ISP support and is having
--On Tuesday, 19 February, 2008 16:05 +0100 Iljitsch van Beijnum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 feb 2008, at 15:40, Dan York wrote:
Is this important? The external address(es) are still
different.
Sure, but the home internal networks are identical. So
Homeowner A calls up the ISP
On 19 feb 2008, at 16:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nobody writes all of this up into a set of guidelines
for implementors of SOHO IPv6 gateways, including some more
details on a proper service discovery mechanism, then it isn't
going to happen.
Well, I was working in
On Feb 19, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
However, in much of the world, profit margins for ISPs in the
residential and SOHO business are sufficiently thin that a
single support call can wipe out a few month's of profits from
that account and one that actually requires getting
On 2008-02-20 04:05, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 19 feb 2008, at 15:40, Dan York wrote:
Is this important? The external address(es) are still different.
Sure, but the home internal networks are identical. So Homeowner A
calls up the ISP support and is having a problem getting a
Hi, Iljitsch,
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 feb 2008, at 16:30, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
If you really want this, you can simply create a loopback interface
with address fc00::1 on it and users can type http:// [fc00::1]/ (ok,
so the brackets are annoying, but no NAT
