Bert asks:
> So how about this possible text:
>
> 5.4 Other ISOC Support
>
>Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
>in Section 6. ISOC will periodically credit additional funds to the
>IASA accounts to cover anticipated expenditures for that period
>
> Bert asks:
>
> > So how about this possible text:
> >
> > 5.4 Other ISOC Support
> >
> >Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
> >in Section 6. ISOC will periodically credit additional funds to the
> >IASA accounts to cover anticipated expenditures
> So... why is it an issue when I suggest it?
nothing special for you Bert :-)
> But does your text not boil down to the same process?
it might or it might mean that a big pool of money is maintained
whatever - the bottom line is that the IASA needes to be able to
count on money being available
At 10:14 PM +0100 12/21/04, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
So how about this possible text:
5.4 Other ISOC Support
Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
in Section 6. ISOC will periodically credit additional funds to the
IASA accounts to cover anticipated exp
>
> > So... why is it an issue when I suggest it?
>
> nothing special for you Bert :-)
>
Thanks... I did not think so either, but it looked like it.
> > But does your text not boil down to the same process?
>
> it might or it might mean that a big pool of money is maintained
> whatever - the b
At 4:58 PM -0500 12/21/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
> So... why is it an issue when I suggest it?
nothing special for you Bert :-)
But does your text not boil down to the same process?
it might or it might mean that a big pool of money is maintained
whatever - the bottom line is that the IASA needes
Ted Hardie wrote:
At 4:58 PM -0500 12/21/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
> So... why is it an issue when I suggest it?
nothing special for you Bert :-)
But does your text not boil down to the same process?
it might or it might mean that a big pool of money is maintained
whatever - the bottom line is th
Hi Bert,
At 11:13 PM +0100 12/21/04, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
May be I need to explain my (personal) thinking.
This is good, because your personal thinking does not match my
personal thinking and perhaps that is why we have been having trouble
coming to wording that seems right to both of us.
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 14:52
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Issue: #748: Section 5.4 - Quarterly deposits
> inappropriate
>
>
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> At 11:13 PM +0100 12/21/
I think that there is a different side of this.
Suppose that a budget was worked out (as below), with a plan for a certain
expected coverage from ISOC general funds, meeting fees, and directed
donations.
Lets presume the budget includes the plan for building the reserves.
If meeting fees run high
Joel,
Joel M. Halpern wrote:
I think that there is a different side of this.
Suppose that a budget was worked out (as below), with a plan for a
certain expected coverage from ISOC general funds, meeting fees, and
directed donations.
Lets presume the budget includes the plan for building the reser
The concern (and I think it is minor but not insignificant) is not with
incompatibility.
It is that as currently written, in the case of more IETF earmarked
donation than expected, it is equally consistent with the text that either
1) ISOC maintains their level of general contribution to IETF act
Joel,
Money has this tricky property of being fungible, which is what allows
governments, funding agencies, and even corporate finance people,
to play such games. But on the other hand, what do you expect ISOC to
do in a year when, for whatever reason, its general income is significantly
down and d
So I have made (for now) this change.
OLD:
5.4 Other ISOC Support
Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
in Section 6. ISOC shall credit the appropriate IASA accounts at
least quarterly.
NEW:
5.4 Other ISOC Support
Other ISOC support s
14 matches
Mail list logo
