On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 21:32:28 +0100 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds good to me, except why did we drop the last sentence?
If you look at the email archives, then you can see that we concluded
that in this section (which is about ISOC responsibilities) it seems
not
Inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Hutzelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 21:15
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Issue #787 - Transparency in sect 7
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 18:0
On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 18:01:31 +0100 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Issue 787 is linked to issue 794
Inside 787 we have several topics in fact. One of them is
Transparency in sect 7
Harald (justified and) suggested to change the current text
Transparency: The IETF comm