This draft does not address at least one issue raised in WGLC. It also
contains substantial changes made after the close of WGLC that have
received too little attention from the WG. Accordingly, I continue to
oppose publication of this document[1]. I suggest that the IESG refer it
back
At 11:50 04/12/2007, Sam Weiler wrote:
This draft does not address at least one issue raised in WGLC. It
also contains substantial changes made after the close of WGLC that
have received too little attention from the WG. Accordingly, I
continue to oppose publication of this document[1]. I
This draft does not address at least one issue raised in WGLC. It
also contains substantial changes made after the close of WGLC that
have received too little attention from the WG. Accordingly, I
continue to oppose publication of this document[1]. I suggest that
the IESG refer it back to
-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System
(DNS) IANA Considerations) to BCP
This draft does not address at least one issue raised in WGLC. It
also contains substantial changes made after the close of WGLC that
have received too little attention from the WG. Accordingly, I
continue to oppose
Hi,
Thanks for your comment on 2929bis. See response below at @@@
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:08 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:16:19PM -0500,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 103 lines which said:
How about adding the following to Section 3.1.1?
After a completed template has been formally posted to
namedroppers by IANA the Expert shall post a
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:48:11AM -0500,
The IESG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
The IESG has received a request from the DNS Extensions WG (dnsext) to
consider the following document:
- 'Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations '
