Looks like there was a misunderstanding on my part r.e. the
InetAddressType refinement. The refinement only applies to the
InetAddress objects, InetAddressType should be unmodified, apologies for
that. I'll issue an update, however AFAIK the other comments still apply.
Thanks,
Julian
Wijnen,
Thanks for your email, comments inline
Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
Based on the errors/warnings I get from both SMICNG and SMILINT, I
wonder how
how an IETF Last Call can go out for a MIB module in this shape.
I did not look at any MIB details yet.
I get this from SMICng:
Since SMICng
W.r.t.
> >Based on the errors/warnings I get from both SMICNG and SMILINT, I
> >wonder how how an IETF Last Call can go out for a MIB module in this
> >shape.
> >
> >I did not look at any MIB details yet.
> >
> >I get this from SMICng:
> >
> >
> Since SMICng is a commercial tool for which I don
Based on the errors/warnings I get from both SMICNG and SMILINT, I
wonder how
how an IETF Last Call can go out for a MIB module in this shape.
I did not look at any MIB details yet.
I get this from SMICng:
C:\bwijnen\smicng\work>smicng mgmd.inc
E: f(mgmd.mi2), (90,38) A SIZE or range clause ma
