Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-03-21 Thread Yoshihiro Ohba
Russ, First of all, thank you very much for your input. [1] I checked the latest 802.11ma draft and I confirm that the description in pana-framework draft stating that Class 1 data frames can be received in any state is not applicable any more. So the description on Class 1 data frame should be

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-03-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Yoshihiro" == Yoshihiro Ohba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: e email discussion over Yoshihiro> the EAP mailing list quoted below, I had a short Yoshihiro> conversation on this issue with Jesse Walker during Yoshihiro> IEEE 802 interim meeting in January in order to Yoshihiro> f

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-03-21 Thread Yoshihiro Ohba
If implementability of the specification is an issue, my company has an implementation of bootstrapping 802.11i PSK mode based on running PANA over Uncontrolled Port. The implementation works without modifying a WiFi hardware or its firmware. We have a plan to publish the source code of the imple

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-03-22 Thread Alper Yegin
We (Samsung) have an implementation as well. Alper > -Original Message- > From: Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:02 AM > To: Sam Hartman > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 > > If

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-03-22 Thread Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
: Alper Yegin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:19 AM To: 'Yoshihiro Ohba'; 'Sam Hartman' Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 We (Samsung) have an implementation as well. Alper > -Original Message- > Fr

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-03-22 Thread Alper Yegin
-Original Message- > From: Bob O'Hara (boohara) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:34 PM > To: Alper Yegin; Yoshihiro Ohba; Sam Hartman > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 > > I have no doubt that an im

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-04-06 Thread Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
22, 2006 11:55 AM To: Bob O'Hara (boohara); 'Yoshihiro Ohba'; 'Sam Hartman' Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 Hi Bob, Last two e-mails were in response to Sam's "implementability" concern. Note that, when an IEEE 8

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-04-06 Thread Nelson, David
Bob O'Hara writes... > I can't forecast what an official interpretation > response might say, but the text in clause 5 is taken from the overview > section of the standard. The text prohibiting non-802.1X frames from > passing on the uncontrolled port is taken from clause 6, the description > of

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-04-06 Thread Alper Yegin
From: Bob O'Hara (boohara) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:49 PM > To: Alper Yegin; Yoshihiro Ohba; Sam Hartman > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 > > Alper, > > In my reading of 802.11i, such an

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-04-06 Thread Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
ion of the standard. -Bob -Original Message- From: Alper Yegin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:22 PM To: Bob O'Hara (boohara); 'Yoshihiro Ohba'; 'Sam Hartman' Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 Hi Bob

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-04-06 Thread Yoshihiro Ohba
ursday, April 06, 2006 4:22 PM > To: Bob O'Hara (boohara); 'Yoshihiro Ohba'; 'Sam Hartman' > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 > > > Hi Bob, > > I think the issue at hand is not the interpretation of text, but the

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06

2006-04-06 Thread Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
46 PM To: Bob O'Hara (boohara) Cc: Alper Yegin; Yoshihiro Ohba; Sam Hartman; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 Thanks for the URL to the "interpretation request". The text in the URL says: " Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the int