RE: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-12 Thread Pasi.Eronen
Eric Rescorla wrote: My TLS co-chair suggests that this document should go forward as Experimental. I see two problems with that. First: it assigns code points out of a space which is reserved for Standards Action. A correction: the draft needs code points from two different registries (TLS

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-12 Thread EKR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric Rescorla wrote: My TLS co-chair suggests that this document should go forward as Experimental. I see two problems with that. First: it assigns code points out of a space which is reserved for Standards Action. A correction: the draft needs code points from

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-10 Thread Frank Ellermann
Eric Rescorla wrote: The listed terms are RAND but not necessarily royalty-free. Doesn't RAND mean Royalty-free And Non-Discriminatory ? I tried define:RAND at Google, but didn't get that one. Frank ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-10 Thread EKR
Frank Ellermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric Rescorla wrote: The listed terms are RAND but not necessarily royalty-free. Doesn't RAND mean Royalty-free And Non-Discriminatory ? I tried define:RAND at Google, but didn't get that one. Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory. -Ekr

RE: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-10 Thread Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
R is for Reasonable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_Non_Discriminatory_Licensing Dan -Original Message- From: Frank Ellermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:31 PM To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-10 Thread Clint Chaplin
RANDZ is what you are thinking of. On 3/10/07, Frank Ellermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Rescorla wrote: The listed terms are RAND but not necessarily royalty-free. Doesn't RAND mean Royalty-free And Non-Discriminatory ? I tried define:RAND at Google, but didn't get that one. Frank

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-10 Thread Frank Ellermann
EKR wrote: [RAND] Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory. Thanks also to Dan and Clint, apparently I confused it with RANDZ. The rule to expand acronyms on first usage in RFCs is really good for me... :-) Frank ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07

2007-03-09 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hi Eric, My take fwiw: I personally don't believe that the slightly-inventive bit of the stuff I sent to the patent lawyer should cover this I-D - at the time, (and I've no records to help, sorry), we weren't blessed with open source browsers and so we had to use proxies to insert our