Re: WG Action: Rechartered Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)

2012-11-01 Thread t . p .
I realise that the timekeeping of the IETF is not on a par with its engineering, but it seems a shame to promulgate a new charter for which every milestone is already several months in arrears. Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "The IESG" To: "IETF-Announce" Cc: "bfd WG" Sent: Tues

RE: WG Action: Rechartered Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)

2012-11-05 Thread Adrian Farrel
milestones once the new charter text was posted, so I hope we'll see that "soon". Cheers, Adrian > -Original Message- > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of t.p. > Sent: 01 November 2012 09:28 > To: ietf@ietf.org > Subje

Re: WG Action: Rechartered Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)

2012-11-08 Thread t . p .
On Behalf Of t.p. > > Sent: 01 November 2012 09:28 > > To: ietf@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: WG Action: Rechartered Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd) > > > > I realise that the timekeeping of the IETF is not on a par with its > > engineering, but i

RE: WG Action: Rechartered Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)

2012-11-08 Thread Adrian Farrel
gt; To: afar...@juniper.net; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: WG Action: Rechartered Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd) > > - Original Message - > From: "Adrian Farrel" > To: "'t.p.'" ; > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 5:43 PM > > He