...
[gwz]
(I wonder how much the costs would go down if the meeting ended at 4PM
Thursday
instead of noon on Friday, and there was only one plenary night on
Wednesday.)
[gwz]
[gwz] Probably not at all. I only have experience with sponsoring one IETF,
but in that case ( I believe generally) the
Gray
Principal Engineer
Ericsson
-Original Message-
From: YAO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 7:03 AM
To: IETF Secretariat; ietf@ietf.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF
Adrian Farrel wrote:
We shall see, but I don't know that putting up the price necessarily
fixes the registration income issue. You only have to deter a relatively
small proportion of attendees to wipe out the increase in charge.
I assume that the converse is also being applied: viz. cutting
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 07:03:03PM +0800,
YAO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 71 lines which said:
the price of ticket to join the IETF is not to encourage the
individual with little dollars and small company to join the IETF.
I agree.
Raising the ticket price is to raise the
See the recent email on ietf-announce:
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Kurt Erik Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 4, 2007 17:13:49 GMT+03:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: IAOC Jabberr [EMAIL PROTECTED], ietf@ietf.org, IESG \(\(E-mail\)
\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vancouver meeting
YAO writes:
joining the IETF is luxury for individual.
[...]
it seems that IETF is becoming a wealthy club.
I agree it's a shame, but I disagree with your conclusions. The IETF
isn't a membership organization. You don't pay any dues to belong to
it, and there's no requirement to go to any
We shall see, but I don't know that putting up the price necessarily fixes
the registration income issue. You only have to deter a relatively small
proportion of attendees to wipe out the increase in charge.
I assume that the converse is also being applied: viz. cutting meeting
costs. It's
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
YAO writes:
joining the IETF is luxury for individual.
[...]
it seems that IETF is becoming a wealthy club.
I agree it's a shame, but I disagree with your conclusions. The IETF
isn't a membership organization. You don't pay any dues to belong to
On Sep 7, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Glen Zorn wrote:
...
[gwz]
(I wonder how much the costs would go down if the meeting ended at 4PM
Thursday
instead of noon on Friday, and there was only one plenary night on
Wednesday.)
[gwz]
[gwz] Probably not at all. I only have experience with sponsoring
one
*
* The official business of the IETF is still conducted -- for free and
* without discrimination -- on open mailing lists. I hope it always
* remains that way.
*
Unfortuantley, a lot of experience in the Internet community has shown
us that it is very difficult to reach actual
Adrian Farrel wrote:
We shall see, but I don't know that putting up the price
necessarily fixes the registration income issue. You only
have to deter a relatively small proportion of attendees to
wipe out the increase in charge.
I assume that the converse is also being applied: viz.
11 matches
Mail list logo
