Hi Steve,
On 2009-02-11 08:19, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:59:52 -0800
> "Lawrence Rosen" wrote:
>> Why don't we organize to answer the patent claim infringement issues
>> like professionals do? Ask technical experts. Consult a patent
>> attorney. Render expert opinio
Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I'm not sure I'd really believe any determination short of a court's
> anyway -
> attorneys can advise, but until the proverbial butcher-baker-
> candlestickmaker
> get their say after a trial, it's got an element of coin-toss to it, no?
I respond only to this specific point.
On Feb 10, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: "Lawrence Rosen"
The result of the FSF campaign has been to raise a legal concern
obviously important to many of us: Will users of the proposed IETF
TLS
specification require patent licenses from RedPhone to use such
implementations
> From: "Lawrence Rosen"
> The result of the FSF campaign has been to raise a legal concern
> obviously important to many of us: Will users of the proposed IETF TLS
> specification require patent licenses from RedPhone to use such
> implementations in the US or elsewhere?
Tha
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:59:52 -0800
"Lawrence Rosen" wrote:
> The result of the FSF campaign has been to raise a legal concern
No, they didn't raise the concern. The concern had been raised
previously by people who are obviously IETF participants, including
Simon Josefsson. (I don't recall if y
The result of the FSF campaign has been to raise a legal concern obviously
important to many of us: Will users of the proposed IETF TLS specification
require patent licenses from RedPhone to use such implementations in the US
or elsewhere?
I don't yet know the answer to this question. Does anyone
