Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-06-29 Thread Scott Bradner
> It's not a hard concept. It just isn't mentioned or implied in RFC 2780. neither is not drinking gasoline but I trust that will not change your desire to not do so Scott ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-07-01 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Scott, --On 29. juni 2005 19:22 -0400 Scott Bradner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's not a hard concept. It just isn't mentioned or implied in RFC 2780. neither is not drinking gasoline but I trust that will not change your desire to not do so while Brian and the IESG have certainly chosen

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-07-01 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:26:31 +0200 From:Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | So we've got two possible interpretations: | | - The authors and the community that let this be published thought that | there were some ca

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-07-01 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
--On fredag, juli 01, 2005 19:20:37 +0700 Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date:Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:26:31 +0200 From:Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | So we've got two possible interpretations: | | - The aut

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-07-01 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 07:20:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > > I do not agree. To me, everything in 2434 is talking about what level > of documentation should be required to register a parameter (code point, > whatever you want to call it) via the IANA. The "IESG approval" > section contains

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-07-01 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:14:54 +0200 From:Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | I don't agree, which is no surprise. Not really! | RFC 2434 also says (section 2): | |One way to insure community review of prospectiv

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IP

2005-07-01 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:24:42 -0400 From:"Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | So if someone documented a code point in a registry with a scares | number of available code points which was actively harmful to the | entire infrastru