I've put together a draft web page that is intended to be usable to any
working group mailing list. I'd appreciate review comments on it.
It is at:
http://mipassoc.org/mass/ietf-list-rules.html
Looks good Dave - thanks for doing this. One thing that could be added is
info on what is an
But as he said, that page doesn't help us define what makes an ietf list,
just lists the ones that are.
right.
the goal of this particular page is the equivalent of NOTE WELL. It is
intended to be used as a way of a priori declarations of list rules,
rather than more general aspects of
At 16:09 25/07/2005, Dave Crocker wrote:
But as he said, that page doesn't help us define what makes an ietf list,
just lists the ones that are.
right.
the goal of this particular page is the equivalent of NOTE WELL. It is
intended to be used as a way of a priori declarations of list
It would be great to have an IETF-wide, core consensus-based statement on
Acceptable Use that new lists could just point to.
For working group lists, people point to RFC 2418 (WG guidelines) and
RFC 3434 (updates), and for the IETF list, they point to RFC 3005 (IETF
list charter). And
We were faced with this question some time ago, and the result was the
creation of the IETF Non-WG mailing lists page,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi
The theory being that if something is listed there, the IETF definitely
considers it an IETF list; if it is not listed,
One rule of any list policy would be: stick to the subject or change
the subject header, I think.
Brian
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
Dear Harald,
At 01:14 21/07/2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
So I resorted to here's what would happen if this was a WG list, and
I had the power of the
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On onsdag, juli 20, 2005 14:49:27 -0700 Dave Crocker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I am burdening the IETF list with this note because I looked around on
the IETF web pages and couldn't find the document or statement that
would resolve the point.
The
--On 21. juli 2005 12:49 +0200 Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when having to evaluate the question for the ietf-languages list a
month ago, I did not find a written statement anywhere that said here's
how you operate an IETF list that is not a WG list.
One of the first items
Volunteer in the house?
Sure.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 12:45 21/07/2005, Brian E Carpenter said:
One rule of any list policy would be: stick to the subject or change the
subject header, I think.
Brian
Difficult to know if this is or not the subject. I think it is for two
reasons, I might have more precisely documented:
1. There are at least
Thanks for the reminder, Harald.
Actually that looks very close to what I suggested: subject to
IPR rules and relevant to the IETF mission, as judged by an AD.
Brian
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 21. juli 2005 12:49 +0200 Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But when
--On onsdag, juli 20, 2005 14:49:27 -0700 Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Folks,
I am burdening the IETF list with this note because I looked around on
the IETF web pages and couldn't find the document or statement that
would resolve the point.
The question of acceptable behaviors
Dear Harald,
At 01:14 21/07/2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
So I resorted to here's what would happen if this was a WG list, and I
had the power of the WG chair to control the list, and because I run the
list, I'm going to make it happen.
Did you? I will not dispute here the way a
13 matches
Mail list logo
