I think this suggestion should be discussed on rfc-interest, not this mail list.
Russ
On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:55 PM, wrote:
>
> RFC should be renamed to Resulted From Comments. It's now the endpoint of the
> process; Request For Comments dated from when it was the start.
>
> (Though RFCs thr
Cf. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5513>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:30 AM, t.p. wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:55 PM
> Subject: Renaming RFC
>
>
>
> RFC should be renamed to Resulted From Comments. It&#x
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:55 PM
Subject: Renaming RFC
RFC should be renamed to Resulted From Comments. It's now the endpoint
of the process; Request For Comments dated from when it was the start.
Fundamentally disagree.
Some SDOs pr
RFC should be renamed to Resulted From Comments. It's now the endpoint of the
process; Request For Comments dated from when it was the start.
(Though RFCs through workgroups are arguably Resulted from
Collaboration/Consensus/Chairing).
If you're going to alter the process in any way, start her
