+1 to Adrian's suggestion. I'd love to hear from people who live in
the PRC about any of the legal questions I have raised. Using specific
previous IETF discussions seems a fine way to look at it in a very
concrete way.
So far I have heard in private from more than one person that is not
On Sep 24, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Ole Jacobsen (ole) wrote:
>
> Does your above response mean that the host would not consider
> slides and oral presentations made during working group sessions to
> be part of "the Group's activities, visual or audio presentations at
> the conference"? Or does your
At 11:00 AM -0400 9/21/09, David Harrington wrote:
I have not found avoiding smoke in China much worse than in Europe. I
find it much easier to avoid smoke in US cities.
In my experience, it no longer makes sense to talk about smoking in
"Europe" as the situation varies so much from country
Hi,
Here are my impressions regarding the areas of concern you raise.
> (1) The law and associated hotel rule Marshall quoted could be
> violated by what may appear to IETF participants as technical
> discussion. For example, the manipulation/censorship of Internet
> traffic by or under orde
s.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Request for community guidance on issue concerning
afuture meeting of the IETF
> From: Steve Crocker
> The Internet and the IETF are all about engaging, expanding,
> communicating and being open. ... More than a billion people live
in
> China an
On Sep 20, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
I'd be happy to have a WG meeting in the PRC - on topics other than those
common to the security area, but I remain concerned about prior restraint
for the IETF as a whole as a price of holding a meeting there.
I wonder if we could ask.
