These are the facts.
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 16:01, Dean Anderson wrote:
> This is ridiculous. The IETF is not getting a lot of spam, so adding
> SpamAssassin headers is a solution in need of a problem.
"a lot" is a subjective term. Also, unless you are sniffing the traffic into
our netw
Brett Thorson wrote:
The goal is to reduce spam, and reduce the human intervention needed to reduce
spam.
Right. I support the secretariat's efforts to reduce spam and
associated management effort on the IETF lists. Personally, I
have a good experience with SpamAssissin, so to me the technical
