On Fri Jan 18 20:53:25 2008, Chris Lonvick wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Bob Braden wrote:
*
* Section 4.4, second paragraph (s/may/MAY)
* Only a single PARTIAL search return option may be present
in a single
* command.
* Should this be:
* Only a single PARTIAL search
Thanks for the detailed and useful review.
On Fri Jan 18 14:00:14 2008, Chris Lonvick wrote:
Overall, I found the document to be well written and I endorse it
becoming a standards track RFC. I did not find anything that would
appear to be a security problem but I would like to see some of
*
* Section 4.4, second paragraph (s/may/MAY)
* Only a single PARTIAL search return option may be present in a single
* command.
* Should this be:
* Only a single PARTIAL search return option MAY be present in a single
* command.
*
*
* Best regards,
*
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Bob Braden wrote:
*
* Section 4.4, second paragraph (s/may/MAY)
* Only a single PARTIAL search return option may be present in a single
* command.
* Should this be:
* Only a single PARTIAL search return option MAY be present in a single
*
