Re: SRV and http(s) (was Re: [hybi] Last Call: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard)

2011-07-22 Thread Masataka Ohta
Mark Andrews wrote: Transitioning HTTPS to use SRV is complicated because of proxies. There needs to be changes to how clients talk to proxies for HTTPS + SRV to work through proxies. CONNECT server.example.org:100 HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com I was referring to this sort of

SRV and http(s) (was Re: [hybi] Last Call: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard)

2011-07-21 Thread Masataka Ohta
Mark Andrews wrote: Transitioning HTTP to use SRV is trivial even with proxies. Transitioning HTTPS to use SRV is complicated because of proxies. There needs to be changes to how clients talk to proxies for HTTPS + SRV to work through proxies. What's wrong with: https://www.example.com

Re: SRV and http(s) (was Re: [hybi] Last Call: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard)

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 4e290442.3010...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, Masataka Ohta writes: Mark Andrews wrote: Transitioning HTTP to use SRV is trivial even with proxies. Transitioning HTTPS to use SRV is complicated because of proxies. There needs to be changes to how clients talk to proxies for